I think we’ve done enough work on
build and core in CDT 4.0 to last a lifetime. I don’t anticipate needing
much discussion on that at this year’s summit, certainly not ¾ of it.
The time has come to spend a lot more time
on debug and make sure we address the deficiencies we have with the user
experience and to have a road map for new debugger integrations that come along.
In other words, we need to find a way out of this DSF versus CDI thing for the
good of the community. But, before this can happen, people need to understand
DSF, which with its high level of abstraction and use of generics has made that
no easy task. So spending a whole day on it at the CDT summit, hopefully
walking through the GDB/MI integration and dealing with other debug issues is
not out of the question, and I actually believe it needs to happen.
From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007
11:39 AM
To: Piech, Pawel; Dominique Toupin
(QA/EMC)
Cc: Francois Chouinard (QA/EMC);
Veenu Verma (AS/EAB); Device Debugging developer
discussions
Subject: [dsdp-dd-dev] RE: CDT
Summit?
These emails need to
be sent to the dd-dev list so that others who want to attend can comment.
I agree with Pawel
that we use try to do this in conjunction with the CDT summit. Whether it’s
a parallel session or part of the CDT meeting depends on the topics to be
covered, IMO.
Dominique –
can you propose a list of items that you’d like to see covered?
From: Piech, Pawel
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007
5:49 PM
To: Dominique Toupin (QA/EMC)
Cc: Gaff, Doug; Veenu Verma
(AS/EAB); Francois Chouinard (QA/EMC); Marc Khouzam (QA/EMC)
Subject: Re: CDT Summit?
Hi Dominique,
Since Francois and Mark are already at location I think it definitely makes
sense for us to have a workshop on DSF/GDB specifially. But do you think
we need an extra day, or would it be enough to set up a parallel session during
the CDT summit. Last year about 3/4 of the summit was on non debugger
issues, so I could easily see us having a parallel session. I'm only
worried that some people (especially Doug S.) will say that they want to be
included in any and all debugger discussions, so they may take exception to
being left out. Still, if you think a parallel session would be OK, we
could propose to Doug S. and see what he thinks.
Cheers,
-Pawel
Dominique Toupin (QA/EMC) wrote:
Hi Pawel,
At the CDT Summit Sept 25-27 the second bullet on the agenda
is the incorporation of DSF in CDT: http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/summitfall2007
I guess you will be attending?
Could we have a small face to face workshop for DSF/GDB implementation?
Dominique Toupin M.A.Sc., Eng.
Software
Quality Assurance Manager
Group
Function Technology
R&D
PM&T, Software Design & Implementation
Ericsson
America
Tel: +1 514 345 6123, ECN: 810 56123
America
Mobile: +1 514 240 3464
Europe Tel:
+46 8 757 0388, ECN: 850 70388
Europe
Mobile: +46
7 610 11388
MailTo:dominique.toupin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|