[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] FW: [Bug 198697] New: IP-XACT verifier fails toallowinput signal to be connected to inout bus signal
|
Hi Anthony,
If you're using Mylin, that's great. Just checking.
Regarding check-ins - yes, it's customary to create one or more
bugzillas for the work. It helps others see what you're doing.
Ted can respin whenever you need to. Version numbering is up to you
right now, but 0.2.1 makes sense for maintenance releases.
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 1:47 PM
> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] FW: [Bug 198697] New: IP-XACT verifier
fails
> toallowinput signal to be connected to inout bus signal
>
> Doug,
>
> It might do; however at the moment I am using a query in Mylyn to
> monitor IP-XACT related bugs, so I should see them quite quickly. I
> haven't yet really tested this since this is the first IP-XACT related
> bug from anybody since I started using Mylyn.
>
> - Anthony
>
> P.S. I actually have quite a lot of new stuff to check in on the
editor
> (feature and performance improvements) from recent work on my local
> version. Is it conventional to create Bugzilla entries for these sorts
> of things before one checks them in? Also, once I have a new stable
> version (version 0.2.1 or whatever) do we a way of putting post Europa
> versions on an update site?
>
> - Anthony
>
> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > Do you monitor the DD inbox for IP-XACT related bugs?
> >
> > Would it make more sense to create a new inbox, e.g.
> > dd.ipxact.inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx, that you could monitor?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bugzilla-
> daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 11:53 AM
> > To: Gaff, Doug
> > Subject: [Bug 198697] New: IP-XACT verifier fails to allow
> > input signal to be connected to inout bus signal
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198697
> > Product/Component: DD / IP-XACT
> > Summary: IP-XACT verifier fails to allow input signal to
> be
> > connected to inout bus signal
> > Product: DD
> > Version: unspecified
> > Platform: PC
> > OS/Version: Windows XP
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P3
> > Component: IP-XACT
> > AssignedTo: dd.general-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > ReportedBy: mark.edgeworth@xxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Build ID: M20070212-1330
> >
> > Steps To Reproduce:
> > 1.Create an IP-XACT bus def with an inout signal 2.Create an
> > IP-XACT file with one interface which references this bus
> > 3.Add an input signal to the model 4.Connect the model signal
> > to the bus signal using a signal map 5.Check the document The
> > editor reports failure of check 49: mismatched signal directions.
> This
> > probably also occurs on output connected to inout...
> >
> >
> > More information:
>
> --------------------------
>
> Anthony Berent
>
> ARM Ltd
>
> +44 1223 400763
>
>
> --
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> the information in any medium. Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
