Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debug model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debug model and GDB?)

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:07:12 -0400
Delivered-to: dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/dsdp-dd-dev>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:01:13AM -0700, Spear, Aaron wrote:
> I am still hoping to solicit some other opinions on this issue, perhaps
> from folks like ARM Ltd. Who are users of SPIRIT on the hw development
> side of things with their ESL tools and such, and then have been talking
> about using it for debug as well.  
> 
> The question is really should we use SPIRIT directly or a decoupled more
> debugger centric standard? 

Well asked.  I'll await opinions with interest.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debug model and GDB?)
  - From: Spear, Aaron

Prev by Date: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debug model and GDB?)
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT for debug on SPIRIT Consortium roadmap
Previous by thread: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debug model and GDB?)
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] SPIRIT vs a new standard XML schema? (was Debugmodel and GDB?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs