[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dltk-dev] dbgp implementation
- From: Alexey Panchenko <alex.panchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:22:41 +0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q7Ym8nVZXCowivJk2/rsXNJEsKcLnNBQiKPXWe+8iYM=; b=CSLowyYWDqjWIn2oeAVp50H0LUYHA2gchtECcyruogobJKaq1jAB6XByCb4i+j6Lkn d4JEndU6qrP7UCz1AZJCkjs4sMItMv4yQRdml+HeGrLe9G5Snu/QrxQP/OjxQazzCu2o Wcssb0P0YoSBEDOnsIXQeFpbvrZEwQ/NWUvsw7rB3kunjv9UZWodeG07q5YQTt8+WEgg ZidzC2aMJCeKpRZBncRnhMMJnx1/ldJ2i2W3XgDpzPAUdDgocP97JPKVFYmjSi4EKwK4 QceIJG7IVIquouVj1fFZIK0T63GFhU3LccWbIJXrUSJfmTHZ1oHPZ6RzV9Q7D4yYHvvj 7a+w==
Probably it was touched last time about 3 years ago.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 23:19, Jae Gangemi <jgangemi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hello all -
> Â quick question, has the underlying dbgp implementation of the dltk been
> mostly consistent as of late? or perhaps a better question is when was the
> last time any major work was done there?
> Â there seems to be an issue w/ the lastest version of the dbgp perl
> implementation and not being able to retrieve array values properly. i tried
> the debugger using a much older version of the protocol and everything
> worked fine, so i'm inclined to think there is some bug in the protocol or a
> blanket change was made that i will need to figure out how to handle b/c it
> potentially doesn't affect other languages.
> Â thanks!
> dltk-dev mailing list