Re: [Dltk-dev] dltk roadmap

[Edgar Espina <espina.edgar@xxxxxxxxx>]

excellent news!!!, are you going to include the multiple language support per project?

Thanks,

edgar

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Alex Panchenko <alex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

One of directions is making DLTK easy to use by adopters.

For example, at the moment there are too many abstract methods, some of them should be implemented by DLTK Core instead of providing the same implementation for each language. Most of the time DLTK should provide some reasonable defaults, and a way to override them.

Regarding API changes. There are no plans to break important interfaces like IModelElement hierarchy (at least not right now). And definitely we'll try to discuss such changes if they are required. 

But breaking API is easy. For example, I've just deleted unused & deprecated for long time interfaces ICompletionRequestor & ICodeCompletionRequestor. Formally it is the breaking change :-)

Regards,
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Ganor" <roy@xxxxxxxx>

To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" <dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:15:04 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] dltk roadmap

Thanks Alex,

 

Can you specify what API you consider to break? What is the new feature / capability that is added that requires it.

 

Roy

From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:18 PM
To: DLTK Developer Discussions
Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] dltk roadmap

 

Hi Roy,

 

Version number will be definitely 3.0, as major part should be incremented on breaking API changes.

And some improvements require changing the API.

 

Regards,
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Ganor" <roy@xxxxxxxx>
To: dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:14:40 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: [Dltk-dev] dltk roadmap

Hi,

 

Can you share what do you think should be the roadmap of the DLTK project?

Are we going to release 3.0.0 @ Indigo or 2.1.0 @ Indigo?

What is the content of the roadmap.

 

Best regards,

Roy

 

_______________________________________________ dltk-dev mailing list dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev

_______________________________________________ dltk-dev mailing list dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev

_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev

-- 
edgar