RE: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action

["Nir Cohen" <nir.c@xxxxxxxx>]

Great, 
Will these changes be available on tomorrows milestone ? (M4 ?)

Nir

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dltk-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:49 AM
> To: DLTK Developer Discussions
> Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I think I have fixed some issues related script folder move operations.
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrey Platov" <andrey@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" <dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:43:51 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty,
> Novosibirsk
> Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> 
> 
> I guess we should be ready with resolving this issue earlier to
> understand stability of solution and its affect on depending
> components/projects.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Andrey
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Panchenko" <alex@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" <dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:04:32 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty,
> Novosibirsk
> Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> DLTK is +3, M4+3 is January,5
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nir Cohen" <nir.c@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" <dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 5:56:30 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty,
> Novosibirsk
> Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> Thanks Alex,
> 
> Can you elaborate on the schedule of M4 ?
> 
> NirC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dltk-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Roy Ganor
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:32 PM
> To: DLTK Developer Discussions
> Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> Sounds better :)
> 
> Thanks again,
> - Roy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dltk-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:06 PM
> To: DLTK Developer Discussions
> Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> 
> yes, I mean M4.
> 
> Roy Ganor wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > I guess that this change will affect the various tools based on DLTK
> -
> > Great!
> >
> > The timeline you set for this change is weird though since it
> requires
> a
> > change in the behavior (and maybe API) so RC4 is not a good date, did
> > you meant M4?
> >
> > Thanks for sharing,
> > Roy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:30 AM
> > To: DLTK Developer Discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> >
> > Hi Nir,
> >
> > It should be fixed in DLTK.
> >
> > The current code is inherited from JDT, a folder is treated like java
> > package that's why there are some restrictions.
> > So, we can find out the way to move folder: one should use rename
> > operation :) just like with java package.
> >
> > I would like to fix it in DLTK-RC4.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nir Cohen" <nir.c@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 8:48:54 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty,
> > Novosibirsk
> > Subject: [Dltk-dev] Refactor -> move action
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I've noticed a very strange behavior on DLTK based actions, regarding
> > refactor->move action of folders (ScriptFolder elements).
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. When trying to move ScriptFolder within the same ProjectFragment,
> it
> > fails, and ask to rename the file, although the source and the target
> > are different directories.
> >
> > 2. Refactor->move on ScriptFolder-show theses only ProjectFragments,
> and
> > can't "unfold" them and browse to folder level
> >
> > 3. Can't move ScriptFolder to "non-script" folder (outside of the
> > buildpath) - Dialog just won't show these folders as possibility
> >
> >
> >
> > I can't understand the reason behind this strange behaviors, which
> > doesn't go well with Script languages.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bottom line, We need to understand if this can be fixed on DLTK code,
> or
> > we here at Zend, need to override this behavior (then we will need an
> > extension point or similar solution)
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nir (Zend)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dltk-dev mailing list
> > dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > dltk-dev mailing list
> > dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > dltk-dev mailing list
> > dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev