If you have a build that is currently running on the 'unstable' Hudson instance(hosted on https://build.eclipse.org/hudson) and you wish to move to the Hudson instance managed by the Foundation(hosted onhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson) you will need to file a bug against community->hudson with a subject like 'Move job job-name to hudson.eclipse.org'. Webmaster will then import the job and close the bug. Please note that the stable instance does not provide the same plugins as the unstable instance. You may also need to update your job configuration to account for differences in the Hudson deployment.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:04 AM, David Carver wrote:
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson
New and improved, open to any eclipse.org hosted project.
Dave
On 09/17/2010 10:34 AM, Trip Gilman wrote:
Ok, I actually got the publishing
thing working. I hacked the cbi scripts to work with my
buckminster produced build. If you look at the buckminster
releng project in the voice tools project:
https://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/technology/org.eclipse.vtp/Releng/trunk/org.eclipse.vtp.releng.buckminster
You can see how I’ve got that portion set up. I have a cron
that runs a command like this:
/opt/public/common/apache-ant-1.7.1/bin/ant -f
/opt/users/hudsonbuild/.hudson/jobs/buckminster-voicetools-nightly/workspace/org.eclipse.vtp.releng.buckminster/promote.xml
-Dpromote.properties=/opt/users/hudsonbuild/.hudson/jobs/buckminster-voicetools-nightly/workspace/org.eclipse.vtp.releng.buckminster/promote-N.properties
-DthirdPartyJarsDir=/opt/public/cbi/build/3rdPartyJars
I couldn’t get the actual command as I can’t seem to connecto
to build.eclipse.org. Is it down right now or am I having
issues? I am still using the build.eclipse.org/hudson site so
there might be some rework that needs to be done. I got my
stuff working and haven’t paid attention to what’s happened
lately. There is a new dedicated hudson instance?
On 9/17/10 12:20 PM, "Miles Parker" <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> Hi Trip,
>
> This is one of those many cases where despite the
advantages of Buckminster I
> wish I'd stayed with the Athena approach which is very
well documented and
> works well using shell scripts. See for example:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Common_Build_Infrastructure/Publishing
>
> But the basic issue is that we need to get nightly and
interim builds
> published automatically to Eclipse download servers and
be able to manually do
> the same with milestone and release builds. I gather
that this isn't quite as
> simple as it sounds, as there are issues with what you
do with the existing
> files, etc.. But the main issue seems to be that you
can't push to downloads,
> but must instead do that in bud.eclipse.org shell
script. Maybe this won't be
> an issue inside hudson.eclipse.org..
>
> Also, while built-in hudson promote looks easy, I
haven't been able to get it
> working the way I'd like even on simple homegrown
project and it doesn't
> appear to be flexible enough to handle complexities of
Eclipse style releases.
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Trip Gilman wrote:
>
>> Could you guys outline
the promotion process you are looking for. I was
>> able to get most of what I wanted for the Voice
Tools Project working, but
>> I'm not sure I know what you mean by promotion, so
I don't know if any of it
>> might be applicable to you.
>>
>> Trip
>>
>>
>> On 9/17/10 12:08 PM, "Miles Parker" <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, me too. But at this point since my
hudson.eclipse.org isn't working I'd
>>> like to get it working anywhere.. without this
our users aren't able to
>>> actually install any of the fixes we've made in
last two or three months.
>>> Help
>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:54 AM, Stéphane Bouchet
wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> i am facing the same issue, i will be glad
to have some info, too :)
>>>>
>>>> in other hand, i am focusing of getting
this done in hudson.eclipse.org,
>>>> not
>>>> in "old" build.eclipse.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 16/09/2010 19:45, Miles Parker a écrit :
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to figure out how to get a
good promotion going now that I've
>>>>> managed to get the transition to
Buckminster working. Basically I'd just
>>>>> like a one for one swap with the prior
CBI functionality, but it isn't
>>>>> clear
>>>>> how that should happen. I know that
XText was experimenting with a
>>>>> buckminster based promotion scheme
driven from Hudson, but I'm not sure
>>>>> that
>>>>> that is even possible given that hudson
is not inside build firewall. I
>>>>> really need to get this working..
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks very much
>>>>>
>>>>> Miles
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>> dash-dev mailing list
>>>>> dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
<stephane_bouchet.vcf>_______________________________________________
>>>> dash-dev mailing list
>>>> dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dash-dev mailing list
>>> dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dash-dev mailing list
>> dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> dash-dev mailing list
> dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
_______________________________________________
dash-dev mailing list
dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
_______________________________________________
dash-dev mailing list
dash-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
|
