We discussed this briefly this morning (unfortunate that you had a
conflict) . The best documentation of this I could find was in
these notes:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Dali_Project/Weekly_Meeting/August_20_2010
Not much related to o.e.jpt.eclipselink there, but thinking about it
now, it seems that the 2 main distinctions in our code base will be
ORM and OXM (JPA and JAXB). Generic or EclipseLink seems like a
secondary distinction, below the two base components, but we can
discuss further here and/or tomorrow morning.
Neil
On 9/29/2010 1:29 PM, Brian Vosburgh wrote:
I thought we discussed a while back that all the
EclipseLink code would be under
o.e.jpt.eclipselink and not spread across various other
branches. It almost feels like
this is doing just the opposite of what we did as a result of
that discussion?
On 09/29/10 10:40, Paul Fullbright wrote:
A
new plugin:
org.eclipse.jpt.jaxb.core
has been added, and an existing plugin:
org.eclipse.jpt.eclipselink.jaxb.core.schemagen
has been renamed to:
org.eclipse.jpt.jaxb.eclipselink.core.schemagen
Those and the existing plugins:
org.eclipse.jpt.jaxb.ui
org.eclipse.jpt.jaxb.core.schemagen
have been added under a new "jaxb" component under
org.eclipse.jpa in CVS.
The existing jaxb plugins under the "jpa" component have been
replaced with stub projects.
_______________________________________________
dali-dev mailing list
dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dali-dev
|
