FYI, here's another annotation bug for which to potentially cast your
votes. As Walter says, it'll take constant pressure to get the changes
we want and need in the JDT.
- Paul
-------- Original Message --------
Thanks. I've just submitted a bug report of my own, also related to
treating annotations as a first-class citizen:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149768 .
It's related to your property editor needs in that in order to fix it, I
think they'll need to start treating annotation changes with more
granularity.
It will be a hard fight; in particular, as I understand it the JDT model
has a difficult time modeling annotation values, so there are
deep-seated changes that would have to be made. But it's important to
keep applying pressure.
-w
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fullbright [mailto:paul.fullbright@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:43 AM
To: Walter Harley
Subject: JDT Annotation enhancements
Hi Walter,
Here's a collection of bugs that deal with annotations. I'm pretty sure
I've voted for them all. If you have any ideas about how to get more
grassroots action on these, I'd love to hear about it.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_id=79112%2C%2093120%2C%201
06108%20%2C%20130778&bugidtype=include&order=bugs.bug_id
(Here's a duplicate:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=138230)
Thanks,
- Paul
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
|
