[cross-project-issues-dev] Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cross-project-issues-dev] Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse

From: "Becker, Matthias" <ma.becker@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:22:27 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Delivered-to: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cross-project-issues-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHUgLKOGyLpcwwd80+hrQ6UNKzfew==
Thread-topic: Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.13.0.181109

Dear mac Users and Experts,

with macOS Mojave Apple did introduce the notarization of apps.
https://developer.apple.com/developer-id/ says: “Note that in an upcoming release of macOS, Gatekeeper will require Developer ID signed software to be notarized by Apple.”

Currently the eclipse packages distributed via Eclipse.org are signed but not notarized. I think we should enable notarization for the Eclipse packages. What do you think?

Regards,
Matthias

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse
  - From: Ed Merks

Prev by Date: [cross-project-issues-dev] Planning to delete org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ImageAndMessageArea as announced for June 2018
Next by Date: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse
Previous by thread: [cross-project-issues-dev] Planning to delete org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ImageAndMessageArea as announced for June 2018
Next by thread: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Notarize Mac Version of Eclipse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs