Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen

Hi

Comments inline.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 18/07/2016 16:42, Doug Schaefer wrote:
The +# days thing has never made sense, really. If you really chain dependencies I’m sure you’d get into double digits. In fact, CDT cycles on itself with a couple of other projects.
It's not perfect, but its better than nothing. At +1, we have EMF < UML < OCL, and worse OCL depends on XText at +2. We survive, only one OCL re-contribution in a couple of years.
Graphiti at +2, seems better.

Probably what would be better would be a better way to publicize API changes that affect downstream builds. Don’t really have an answer there but it is what causes problems. If APIs are well managed, in theory, you can build before you’re dependencies do.
I think that it would be reasonable to very strongly recommend that breaking API appear in an I-build a week before +0 so that nightly builds should detect problems comfortably before the last minute.

Just a thought,
Doug.

From: <cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Wenz, Michael" <michael.wenz@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen

David,

 

yes, you are right Graphiti is a framework. On the other hand we have dependencies to GEF and EMF Transactions/Validation with is at +2.

 

Graphiti has been on +3 since it joined the release train, so far it has never been an issue. Or at least these issues did not reach me.

 

In case any user of Graphiti struggles with this, this would be a good time to speak up. I’m open towards changing to an earlier day in case that is required.

 

Thanks,

Michael

 

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Montag, 18. Juli 2016 16:25
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen

 

I believe Graphiti is a "framework", right? To be used by others? As such +3 does not make much sense. +3 is more for "leaf" components that no one else depends on. +1 or +2 makes more sense to me, depending on what you depend on.

As always, feel free to correct any misconceptions I have.





From:        "Wenz, Michael" <michael.wenz@xxxxxxx>
To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        07/18/2016 02:23 AM
Subject:        [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





Hi,
 
Graphiti will be participating in Oxygen:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.graphiti/releases/0.14.0
 
Offset will be +3.
 
Michael_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com



Back to the top