Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!

The old org.eclipse.rap bundles come from RTP. Holger will update the
RTP contribution in about an hour.

Regards,
Ralf

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Hübner <dennis.huebner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.2012 um 16:13 schrieb Ralf Sternberg:
>
> For the duplicate org.eclipse.rap.* bundles, 1.5.0.20120612-1458 our
> RC4 contribution, 20120605-1606 is RC3. I guess someone depending on
> the rap runtime has not picked up the RC4 yet, could that be EMF?
>
> We include any rap bundles or features, therefore we have any prefect match
> dependencies to rap.
> Just filter the latest rap version and look which project fails to validate
> (b3 editor). Or grep for
> Provided Capabilities org.eclipse.rap* in b3aggr files.
>
> Regards,
> Dennis.
>
>
> The duplicate org.eclipse.jetty.xml bundles come from the rap tools.
> For some reason, they contain the RC3 version of these bundles. I will
> re-build the rap tools and contribute them to the aggregator. But
> since no one depends on them, this should not affect any other
> project.
>
> Thanks for pointing out these problems!
>
> Ralf
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> David Williams wrote on 06/12/2012 05:15:26 PM:
>
>
> I appreciate everyone keeping the "build green" and making progress
>
> on the "sim rel reports" [1], though there are a few serious issues
>
> left there.
>
>
> [1] http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/
>
>
> I looked through these, and at this point I think most of them are not
>
> blocking the release. Just to save people some time digging through them,
>
> these are the remaining issues that I believe are important for Juno (see
>
> above report for details):
>
>
> 1) 10 bundles with missing about.html. Six bundles from emf.query2, four
>
> from Gemini.
>
>
> 2) 10 features with no license (in particular their license is the string
>
> "%license"). 1 from Virgo, 9 from Gemini. The most common cause of this is
>
> missing key in feature.properties file, or the feature.properties file
>
> itself is not included in the bin.includes list in the feature's
>
> build.properties file.
>
>
> 3) Multiple copies of bundles from eclipse.org projects. These might not be
>
> a problem if they are known or understood, but it might mean another project
>
> is including old, unreleased versions of another project's bundles. The
>
> core.commands dependency seems to be coming from Sapphire, and the remaining
>
> dependencies look like they come from RAP.
>
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.xml
>
>         8.1.3.v20120522
>
>         8.1.3.v20120416
>
> org.eclipse.core.commands
>
>         3.6.1.v20120521-2332
>
>         3.6.1.v20120521-2329
>
> org.eclipse.rap.jface
>
>         1.5.0.20120612-1458
>
>         1.5.0.20120605-1606
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.webapp
>
>         8.1.3.v20120522
>
>         8.1.3.v20120416
>
> org.eclipse.rap.rwt.osgi
>
>         1.5.0.20120612-1458
>
>         1.5.0.20120605-1606
>
> org.eclipse.rap.rwt
>
>         1.5.0.20120612-1458
>
>         1.5.0.20120605-1606
>
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


Back to the top