Hmm… I assumed that Buckminster would not be greedy. This reply seems to imply that it *will* be, but perhaps wasn't.
Looking at the report, I have some that are there because they're defined via xtext settings, as well as the agf3d stuff that pulls in the gef3d. *But* that agf3d stuff shouldn't be in there in the first place.
So I'm going to switch from Buckminster 3.6 to 4.2 and see if that takes care of issue by itself.
On 2012-06-06, at 10:11 AM, David M Williams wrote: > My understanding was the the aggregator pulled the feature
-- and only the feature -- dependencies it needed from the aggregated site(s).
Is that not correct?
That is pretty much the case ... but
... it can get complicated. Do you have any optional dependencies on it
and do you publish without "greedy=false" attribute? If so, you
are "getting what you ask for" :)
If that's not the case (no optional
dependencies and/or use greedy="false") then ... not sure. Might
be someone else has an optional (greedy) dependency on it (and, yes, it
can then still find it in your repo).
From:
Miles Parker <miles.parker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
06/06/2012 12:55 PM
Subject:
[cross-project-issues-dev]
Bundles Re: Layout and licenses
Sent by:
cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
AMP must be the cause for GEF3D, but I'm not sure why
that is happening. AMP as a stand-alone project includes GEF3D, but we
created a non-GEF3D feature for Indigo/Juno specifically because GEF3D
isn't on release train and because GEF3Ds 3D lib dependencies all live
in IP hell. The feature we point to is the "GEF3Dless" feature.
So while GEF3D is in our repos, it should *not* be in Juno repos. My understanding
was the the aggregator pulled the feature -- and only the feature -- dependencies
it needed from the aggregated site(s). Is that not correct?
On 2012-06-06, at 6:16 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Hey folks. I'm going through the layout and licenses reports
today.
I've already opened a couple of bugs regarding missing about files and
am just starting into the licenses. These issues need to be addressed before
any reviews can be declared successful. Note that these are very basic
requirements that are independent of participation in the simultaneous
release. If you need help, please ask.
There a Gemini JPA bundle in the repository. I'm also seeing a GEF3D bundle.
Why? If these bundles are in the repository, shouldn't the owning projects
be Juno particpants? Or did I miss a memo?
org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.0.99.v20120225-1927.jar
org.eclipse.gef3d_0.8.1.v20120528-0244.jar
Who owns these bundles:
org.eclipse.rephraserengine.core_8.0.0.201205300709.jar
org.eclipse.rephraserengine.ui_8.0.0.201205300709.jar
(I'll guess tools.ptp.photran based on the version number).
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
______________________________
Miles T. Parker
Senior Solutions Architect
Tasktop
http://tasktop.com
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo
Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
http://milesparker.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
______________________________ Miles T. Parker Senior Solutions Architect Tasktop Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
|