Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is it acceptable to have two com.google.c

[Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

Does no-one have a view on whether provision of the 
com.google.common.collect package by two distinct Orbit bundles is 
acceptable?

    Regards

        Ed Willink


On 15/12/2011 06:25, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi
>
> In Indigo, the com.google.common.collect package was (and still is) 
> provided by the com.google.collect plugin.
>
> It is now also provided by the com.google.guava plugin.
>
> For M4, Xtext 2.2.1 switched to Guava and so switched provider, but 
> the old provider is still available in repositories for downstream 
> projects that neglect to update their dependencies accurately.
>
> As a consequence, the M4 OCL Tools contribution provides broken 
> editors. Since these are technically 'Examples', a respin is clearly 
> not merited, so MDT/OCL will be providing an M4a.
>
> However it seems appropriate to at least warn the community of this 
> hazard, and ask whether this is a serious breach of versioning 
> principles.
>
>     Regards
>
>         Ed Willink
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1890 / Virus Database: 2108/4681 - Release Date: 12/14/11