Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Indigo RC4 +3

We found some issues in the WindowBuilder build.  Missing about.html files and badly versioned plugin.  We have fixed them and I have the code staged.  I would like to update the aggrigator and have the new build contributed the the build.  Does anyone have an issue with this?

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Miles Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, we're contributing o.e.emf.java. Those issues are fixed but because of signing issues I don't have them on aggregator yet.

On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:26 AM, Kenn Hussey wrote:

David,

The bundles from the EMF namespace that are unsigned and missing about.html files (i.e., org.eclipse.emf.java.*) are not coming from the EMF (Core) project. Another project (perhaps AMP?) must be building and contributing these.

Cheers,

Kenn

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:16 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Almost done?

I wanted to remind everyone these reports, at

http://build.eclipse.org/indigo/simrel/

are recreated several times a day (whenever there is a clean build, and a new staging repo created), so be sure to check that your latest contributions solved all the problems that are supposed to be solved.


Especially the first 4 are most important:

Bundles missing required files

Unsigned bundles

Bundles and Features not using 4 part versions

Consistent, current licenses (SUA) in features

There has been a lot of progress in past few weeks, but, a surprising number of problems, given today is the last day.
I know many still have to contribute their +3 contributions. I'm assuming that will fix a lot of issues, but I see some things in these reports that are not from +3 projects.

Who should look at these reports? Project Leads and PMCs if you have a bundle in any of the following name spaces.
The list would be pretty long if I listed everything, and some projects might miss the fact they were in one of the "top" 4 reports ... so, I hope this summary helps you know if the reports are relevant to you. Some just have one or two bundles in the name space, others have scores of bundles ... and I wasn't sure how to summarize (easily).

com.mongodb
org.ascape
org.eclipse.amp
org.eclipse.birt
org.eclipse.cdt
org.eclipse.dltk
org.eclipse.draw3d
org.eclipse.e4
org.eclipse.egf
org.eclipse.egit
org.eclipse.emf
org.eclipse.epf
org.eclipse.gef3d
org.eclipse.gyrex
org.eclipse.jgit
org.eclipse.jwt
org.eclipse.nebula
org.eclipse.riena
org.eclipse.sequoyah
org.eclipse.tm
org.eclipse.wb
org.jivesoftware
org.pushingpixels


Hope it helps.

Good luck.


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
Mark R Russell
(724) 473-3140
Release Engineer
Google Pittsburgh



Back to the top