> I'm doing some work with the EPP packages which led to that I
> built up a
> dependency graph from the Galileo M6 release. I was surprised
> to find a
> lot of conflicting dependencies (using the same ID but version ranges
> that has no overlap). What is the policy in Galileo? Should this be
> permitted or must all projects agree to use the same version of a
> bundle? I think it's asking for trouble installing two
> versions of the
> same bundle into the same runtime.
>
> Here is a list of the current conflicts:
>
> org.apache.commons.codec:osgi.bundle/[1.3.0.v20080530-1600,1.3
> .0.v20080530-1600]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.commons.codec:osgi.bundle/[1.2.0.v20080530-1550,1.2
> .0.v20080530-1550]#OSGi
> org.apache.commons.httpclient:osgi.bundle/[3.1.0.v20080605-193
> 5,3.1.0.v20080605-1935]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.commons.httpclient:osgi.bundle/[3.0.1.v20080605-193
> 0,3.0.1.v20080605-1930]#OSGi
> org.apache.commons.lang:osgi.bundle/[2.3.0.v200803061910,2.3.0
> .v200803061910]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.commons.lang:osgi.bundle/[2.4.0.v20081016-1030,2.4.
> 0.v20081016-1030]#OSGi
> org.apache.commons.logging:osgi.bundle/[1.0.4.v20080605-1930,1
> .0.4.v20080605-1930]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.commons.logging:osgi.bundle/[1.1.1.v20080605-1935,1
> .1.1.v20080605-1935]#OSGi
> org.apache.oro:osgi.bundle/[2.0.8.v200903061218,2.0.8.v2009030
> 61218]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.oro:osgi.bundle/[2.0.8.v200803061811,2.0.8.v2008030
> 61811]#OSGi
> org.objectweb.asm:osgi.bundle/[3.1.0.v200803061910,3.1.0.v2008
> 03061910]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.objectweb.asm:osgi.bundle/[3.0.0.v200803061811,3.0.0.v2008
> 03061811]#OSGi
> javax.wsdl:osgi.bundle/[1.5.0,1.6.0]#OSGi is inconflict with request
> javax.wsdl:osgi.bundle/[1.4.0.v200806030407,1.4.0.v200806030407]#OSGi
> com.ibm.icu:osgi.bundle/[4.0.1.v20090109,4.0.1.v20090109]#OSGi is
> inconflict with request com.ibm.icu:osgi.bundle/[3.4.0,4.0.0)#OSGi
> javax.xml:osgi.bundle/[1.3.4.v200902170245,1.3.4.v200902170245
> ]#OSGi is
> inconflict with request
> javax.xml:osgi.bundle/[1.3.4.v200806030440,1.3.4.v200806030440]#OSGi
> org.apache.xml.resolver:osgi.bundle/[1.2.0.v200902170519,1.2.0
> .v200902170519]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.xml.resolver:osgi.bundle/[1.2.0.v200806030312,1.2.0
> .v200806030312]#OSGi
> org.apache.xml.serializer:osgi.bundle/[2.7.1.v200902170519,2.7
> .1.v200902170519]#OSGi
> is inconflict with request
> org.apache.xml.serializer:osgi.bundle/[2.7.1.v200806030322,2.7
> .1.v200806030322]#OSGi
> javax.wsdl:osgi.bundle/[1.5.1.v200806030408,1.5.1.v20080603040
> 8]#OSGi is
> inconflict with request javax.wsdl:osgi.bundle/[1.4.0,1.5.0)#OSGi
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev