cross-project-issues-dev http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/maillist.html cross-project-issues-dev en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:01:34 GMT Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:01:34 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss MHonArc RSS 2.0 RCFile webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) cross-project-issues-dev http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse.org-common/themes/Phoenix/images/eclipse_home_header.jpg http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/maillist.html Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Please re-test /releases/staging http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03597.html Only update site and mirrors - the EPP packages are not affected.Regards, Markus2009/7/2 Eric Gwin <eric.gwin@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev...
Regards, Markus

2009/7/2 Eric Gwin <eric.gwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
David,

Just a quick follow-up. Is this going to effect the packaging too? In addition to checking the site, and verifying content and functionality. Will we need to verify say the JEE installer packaging? Or is this only going to effect the update site and mirrors?

Thanks.

-Eric


David M Williams wrote:
As most of you know, we have to regenerate our discovery site, without one project, which was not ready to release, after all.
Normally this should be pretty easy to do, but ... our process basically takes a snapshot at a point in time, and the reproducibility, after that point, depends on each project maintaining their own reproducibility of that snapshot. And, there's been three violations of that reproducibility. Rather than leave out those three projects from the discovery site (my own grumpy personal preference, after monkeying around with this for two days) I've tried to work around that problem and essentially re-mirror and regenerate the metadata of the discovery site itself. That actually turned out harder than I would have thought, with some unexpected changes from the original ... some explainable, but some not. But, all of the unexpected changes would appear not to effect installs. Details are in bug 282036.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036

While I'm 99% sure the current staging site is equivalent to the site we released on 6/24 (minus one project), there is the possibility I'm mistaken (as most of you would readily agree. :)  Therefore, I request your help. Each project should do their own sanity checking of the current /releases/staging site and make sure your favorite scenarios still work as you expect (or, at least, works as it does using /releases/galileo). In particular, the scenarios that install into a PDE target (rather than into the IDE) are ones I did not test directly.
I'd like to set a time period of one week for teams to do this retesting. If that length of time is not sufficient, please say so, and we can extend it. But, otherwise, if no objections are raised by the evening of Wednesday 7/8, I'll swap the current staging site for the released site. [That is, we are using negative confirmation, successful re-testing does not need to be documented.]

If anyone notices any issues, problems, or has "mechanical" questions, please comment in bug 282036.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036

Thanks all,

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


]]> Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:57:18 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03597.html mknauer@xxxxxxx (Markus Knauer) Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Please re-test /releases/staging http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03596.html David,
Just a quick follow-up. Is this going to effect the packaging too? In addition to checking the site, and verifying content and functionality. Will we need to verify say the JEE installer packaging? Or is this only going to effect the update site and mirrors?

Thanks.

-Eric

David M Williams wrote:
As most of you know, we have to regenerate our discovery site, without one project, which was not ready to release, after all.

Normally this should be pretty easy to do, but ... our process basically takes a snapshot at a point in time, and the reproducibility, after that point, depends on each project maintaining their own reproducibility of that snapshot. And, there's been three violations of that reproducibility. Rather than leave out those three projects from the discovery site (my own grumpy personal preference, after monkeying around with this for two days) I've tried to work around that problem and essentially re-mirror and regenerate the metadata of the discovery site itself. That actually turned out harder than I would have thought, with some unexpected changes from the original ... some explainable, but some not. But, all of the unexpected changes would appear not to effect installs. Details are in bug 282036.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036

While I'm 99% sure the current staging site is equivalent to the site we released on 6/24 (minus one project), there is the possibility I'm mistaken (as most of you would readily agree. :) Therefore, I request your help. Each project should do their own sanity checking of the current /releases/staging site and make sure your favorite scenarios still work as you expect (or, at least, works as it does using /releases/galileo). In particular, the scenarios that install into a PDE target (rather than into the IDE) are ones I did not test directly.

I'd like to set a time period of one week for teams to do this retesting. If that length of time is not sufficient, please say so, and we can extend it. But, otherwise, if no objections are raised by the evening of Wednesday 7/8, I'll swap the current staging site for the released site. [That is, we are using negative confirmation, successful re-testing does not need to be documented.]

If anyone notices any issues, problems, or has "mechanical" questions, please comment in bug 282036.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036

Thanks all, 


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


]]> Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:53:43 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03596.html eric.gwin@xxxxxxx (Eric Gwin) [cross-project-issues-dev] AUTO: Eugene Chan/Toronto/IBM is out of the office. (returning 07/31/2009) http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03595.html I am out of the office until 07/31/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. For questions and issues with TPTP and RAD, please contact Kathy Chan (kathy@xxxxxxxxxx) If there is a business urgency, please contact my manager Ernest Mah (ernest@xx... I am out of the office until 07/31/2009.

I will respond to your message when I return.

For questions and issues with TPTP and RAD, please contact Kathy Chan (kathy@xxxxxxxxxx)
If there is a business urgency, please contact my manager Ernest Mah (ernest@xxxxxxxxxx)


Note: This is an automated response to your message "[cross-project-issues-dev] Please re-test /releases/staging" sent on 7/1/09 19:59:21.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.]]> Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:03:07 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03595.html ewchan@xxxxxxx (Eugene Chan) [cross-project-issues-dev] Please re-test /releases/staging http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03594.html As most of you know, we have to regenerate our discovery site, without one project, which was not ready to release, after all. Normally this should be pretty easy to do, but ... our process basically takes a snapshot at a point in time, and the reproducibi... As most of you know, we have to regenerate our discovery site, without one project, which was not ready to release, after all. Normally this should be pretty easy to do, but ... our process basically takes a snapshot at a point in time, and the reproducibility, after that point, depends on each project maintaining their own reproducibility of that snapshot. And, there's been three violations of that reproducibility. Rather than leave out those three projects from the discovery site (my own grumpy personal preference, after monkeying around with this for two days) I've tried to work around that problem and essentially re-mirror and regenerate the metadata of the discovery site itself. That actually turned out harder than I would have thought, with some unexpected changes from the original ... some explainable, but some not. But, all of the unexpected changes would appear not to effect installs. Details are in bug 282036. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036 While I'm 99% sure the current staging site is equivalent to the site we released on 6/24 (minus one project), there is the possibility I'm mistaken (as most of you would readily agree. :) Therefore, I request your help. Each project should do their own sanity checking of the current /releases/staging site and make sure your favorite scenarios still work as you expect (or, at least, works as it does using /releases/galileo). In particular, the scenarios that install into a PDE target (rather than into the IDE) are ones I did not test directly. I'd like to set a time period of one week for teams to do this retesting. If that length of time is not sufficient, please say so, and we can extend it. But, otherwise, if no objections are raised by the evening of Wednesday 7/8, I'll swap the current staging site for the released site. [That is, we are using negative confirmation, successful re-testing does not need to be documented.] If anyone notices any issues, problems, or has "mechanical" questions, please comment in bug 282036. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282036 Thanks all, ]]> Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:59:23 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03594.html david_williams@xxxxxxx (David M Williams) Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project list can be confusing http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03593.html -- Nick Boldt :: http://nick.divbyzero.com Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling &amp; Dash Athena You could read Ian's blog:
http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/eclipse-freshman-project-8-riena/

On 06/26/2009 09:04 AM, Szymon Brandys wrote: 
The main page for Galileo http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/ mentions that we
have 33 projects in it.
Looking at http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/projects.php I'm confused since
the list is longer that that.
I assume that some projects e.g. Equinox, Eclipse Platform or JDT are
treated as one, however I'm not too familiar with other projects.

Moreover I would like to check which projects are new to the simultaneous
release.
AFAIK Memory Analyzer is such new project, however I see it on Ganymede
site too http://www.eclipse.org/ganymede/learn.php
How can I get the list of projects added in Galileo?

Regards
--
Szymon Brandys

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


--
Nick Boldt :: http://nick.divbyzero.com
Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash Athena

]]> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:49:16 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03593.html nickboldt@xxxxxxx (Nick Boldt) [cross-project-issues-dev] Build server working directory is read-only http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03592.html I was unable to remount the /shared filesystem on-the-fly. To prevent any data loss, I am taking a snapshot of the filesystem before attempting to unmount it. I will post further updates to this issue in bug http://bugs.eclipse.org/281661 Denis I was unable to remount the /shared filesystem on-the-fly.  To prevent any data loss, I am taking a snapshot of the filesystem before attempting to unmount it.

I will post further updates to this issue in bug http://bugs.eclipse.org/281661

Denis

]]> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:00:13 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03592.html denis.roy@xxxxxxx (Denis Roy) [cross-project-issues-dev] Build server working directory is read-only http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03591.html Folks, A network error occurred on the build server's /shared directory, and the directory entered read-only mode in self-defence. I'll try to remount it read-write on-the-fly, but getting exclusive access to it may prove difficult. Don't be surprised i... Folks,

A network error occurred on the build server's /shared directory, and the directory entered read-only mode in self-defence.  I'll try to remount it read-write on-the-fly, but getting exclusive access to it may prove difficult.  Don't be surprised if I end up rebooting the server.

Thanks,

Denis

]]> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:07:24 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03591.html denis.roy@xxxxxxx (Denis Roy) [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project list can be confusing http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03590.html The main page for Galileo http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/ mentions that we have 33 projects in it. Looking at http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/projects.php I'm confused since the list is longer that that. I assume that some projects e.g. Equinox, Eclipse Pla... The main page for Galileo http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/ mentions that we have 33 projects in it. Looking at http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/projects.php I'm confused since the list is longer that that. I assume that some projects e.g. Equinox, Eclipse Platform or JDT are treated as one, however I'm not too familiar with other projects. Moreover I would like to check which projects are new to the simultaneous release. AFAIK Memory Analyzer is such new project, however I see it on Ganymede site too http://www.eclipse.org/ganymede/learn.php How can I get the list of projects added in Galileo? Regards -- Szymon Brandys ]]> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:04:31 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03590.html Szymon.Brandys@xxxxxxx (Szymon Brandys) Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project listing is incomplete http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03589.html _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev CDO is listed on the page.
Teneo is not listed because it had not declared a release in the portal as specified below.

ECF is not listed because the simultaneousrelease flag has not been set in the portal metadata for the project.

Wayne

Martin Taal wrote:
Hi Wayne,
I set the simultaneous release property today and I have promoted a build for the Galileo release this week. Is there anything else I should do? Maybe Teneo (and also CDO) are not listed because Teneo is a component within EMF (guessing here...)?

gr. Martin

Wayne Beaton wrote:
You need to mark the simultaneous release property *and* have a release with a date between June 21st and July 1st.

FWIW, Nathan and I both posted notes about doing this on this mailing list. We should make a point of adding this to the list of must dos for next year (so that it's more clearly captured).

Wayne

Markus Knauer wrote:
I don't know - I am not the one who did the programming of the page, it only happens that I know from Wayne that this page is generated from data that is taken out of the Foundation Database.

But I am sure that someone from the Foundation will answer these questions when they wake up after a day of Galileo celebrations. ;-)

Regards, Markus


2009/6/25 Martin Taal <mtaal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxx>>

    Hi Markus,
    Is there a delay between changing the settings in the foundation
    page and seeing the result in the page you listed below?

    gr. Martin

    Igor Vinnykov wrote:


        Hi Markus,

        Thanks a lot for the tip! Missed simultaneousrelease property
        was a reason and it’s fixed now!

        Best regards,

        Igor Vinnykov

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 


        *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
        Behalf Of *Markus Knauer
        *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:00 PM
        *To:* Cross project issues
        *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project
        listing is incomplete

        One of the reasons might be that you didn't update your
        project metadata in the Eclipse Foundation portal
        (portal.eclipse.org <http://portal.eclipse.org>
        <http://portal.eclipse.org>). As far as I know the PHP page
        below uses the Foundation Database as input - see screenshot.

        Regards, Markus




        2009/6/25 Igor Vinnykov <igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>>


        Hello,

        Can anyone tell me why Subversive project isn’t listed here:
        http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/projects.php. It’s obviously a
        part of Galileo simultaneous release. How to get it fixed?

        Thanks.

        Best regards,

        Igor Vinnykov

        Subversive Team


        _______________________________________________
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
        cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




        --         Markus Knauer
        EclipseSource
        ### phone: +49 721 664 733 0 (GMT +2)
        ### fax: +49 721 664 733 29
        ### web: www.eclipsesource.com <http://www.eclipsesource.com>
        <http://www.eclipsesource.com>


        Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
        Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
        General Manager: Jochen Krause
        Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB
        107883

------------------------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
With Regards, Martin Taal

    Springsite/Elver.org
    Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
    Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
    The Netherlands
    Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
    Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
    Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
    Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -
    mtaal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxx>
    Web: www.springsite.com <http://www.springsite.com> -
    www.elver.org <http://www.elver.org>


    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
Markus Knauer
EclipseSource
###   phone: +49 721 664 733 0  (GMT +2)
###     fax: +49 721 664 733 29
###     web: www.eclipsesource.com <http://www.eclipsesource.com>

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883

------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



]]> Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:43:03 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03589.html wayne@xxxxxxx (Wayne Beaton) Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project listing is incomplete http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03588.html _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- With Regards, Martin Taal Springsite/Elver.org Office: Hardwarew... Hi Wayne,
I set the simultaneous release property today and I have promoted a build for the Galileo release this week. Is there anything else I should do? Maybe Teneo (and also CDO) are not listed because Teneo is a component within EMF (guessing here...)?

gr. Martin

Wayne Beaton wrote:
You need to mark the simultaneous release property *and* have a release with a date between June 21st and July 1st.

FWIW, Nathan and I both posted notes about doing this on this mailing list. We should make a point of adding this to the list of must dos for next year (so that it's more clearly captured).

Wayne

Markus Knauer wrote:
I don't know - I am not the one who did the programming of the page, it only happens that I know from Wayne that this page is generated from data that is taken out of the Foundation Database.

But I am sure that someone from the Foundation will answer these questions when they wake up after a day of Galileo celebrations. ;-)

Regards, Markus


2009/6/25 Martin Taal <mtaal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxx>>

    Hi Markus,
    Is there a delay between changing the settings in the foundation
    page and seeing the result in the page you listed below?

    gr. Martin

    Igor Vinnykov wrote:


        Hi Markus,

        Thanks a lot for the tip! Missed simultaneousrelease property
        was a reason and it’s fixed now!

        Best regards,

        Igor Vinnykov

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
        Behalf Of *Markus Knauer
        *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:00 PM
        *To:* Cross project issues
        *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo project
        listing is incomplete

        One of the reasons might be that you didn't update your
        project metadata in the Eclipse Foundation portal
        (portal.eclipse.org <http://portal.eclipse.org>
        <http://portal.eclipse.org>). As far as I know the PHP page
        below uses the Foundation Database as input - see screenshot.

        Regards, Markus




        2009/6/25 Igor Vinnykov <igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:igor.vinnykov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>>


        Hello,

        Can anyone tell me why Subversive project isn’t listed here:
        http://www.eclipse.org/galileo/projects.php. It’s obviously a
        part of Galileo simultaneous release. How to get it fixed?

        Thanks.

        Best regards,

        Igor Vinnykov

        Subversive Team


        _______________________________________________
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
        cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




        --         Markus Knauer
        EclipseSource
        ### phone: +49 721 664 733 0 (GMT +2)
        ### fax: +49 721 664 733 29
        ### web: www.eclipsesource.com <http://www.eclipsesource.com>
        <http://www.eclipsesource.com>


        Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
        Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
        General Manager: Jochen Krause
        Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB
        107883

------------------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


    --
    With Regards, Martin Taal

    Springsite/Elver.org
    Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
    Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
    The Netherlands
    Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
    Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
    Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
    Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -
    mtaal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mtaal@xxxxxxxxx>
    Web: www.springsite.com <http://www.springsite.com> -
    www.elver.org <http://www.elver.org>


    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
Markus Knauer
EclipseSource
###   phone: +49 721 664 733 0  (GMT +2)
###     fax: +49 721 664 733 29
###     web: www.eclipsesource.com <http://www.eclipsesource.com>

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


--

With Regards, Martin Taal

Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - mtaal@xxxxxxxxx
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org


]]> Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:21:38 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg03588.html mtaal@xxxxxxx (Martin Taal)