All,
In
consideration of Mr. Whiteman’s point below, does this pose a problem for
anyone? I just sent out an updated invite which extends the duration by
15 minutes at the south end of the meeting…
Thanks,
Jimmy
Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:52 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: Re: [cosmos-dev] Question on sub team meeting contents / format
- DataCollection
I have no
"skin in the game" regarding this since I don't typically attend the
DC call, but the only observation I'd make is that the call would overlap with
the Management Enablement meeting by 15 minutes if you kept it at 10:30 and
increased it to 45 minutes in length. That said, there might be very
little overlap between those who want to be in both the DC and ME meetings.
David
---
David Whiteman | Tivoli Autonomic Computing
Eclipse COSMOS project committer | http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/
david_whiteman@xxxxxxxxxx | 919-254-8224 | T/L 444-8224
Jim Bob wrote on 06/03/2008 12:24:06 PM:
> Mark / Don / et al…
>
> For the first few DC meetings, we have
discussed the gory details of some of the DC
> ERs, in addition to DC status. It is not clear if the
“gory details of the DC ERs”
> belongs to the DC calls or the Arch calls. That said, I would
like to propose the
> following alteration to the DC meeting format:
>
> Increase the duration of the DC call to
45 minutes and broken down as follows:
> ·
Initial 15 minutes: Overall DC status
> ·
Subsequent 30 minutes: DC ER and other low level DC issues…
>
> Any dissenters to this proposal? If so,
what is your counter offer J ???
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy Mohsin
> Cell +1-609-635-1703
