| [cosmos-dev] COSMOS Architecture questions... |
|
Hubert / All, I am trying to capture your Architecture updates in the
attached two slide PPT. I need this for the documentation ERs as well…
In slide 1, I am trying to capture the COSMOS 1.0, i.e. current state….
Some questions: 1.
Since the Domain / Broker are now merged, how should we
represent this? 2.
Should we call the Broker a “Data Broker”? 3.
What do we do in regards to the WSDM EPR’s?
Obviously, they need to go for now; do we need to replace them with something?
I assume this depends on Hubert’s changes. 4.
Do you still agree with the Data Adapter & Data
Manager split? The Data Manager is the COSMOS “bridge”
component; whereas the Data Adapter is the component that houses the
product-specific business rules that apply to the data. The idea is to
convey that the Data Manager does not communicate to a product store directly… Don / Mark / All, Through some of the early adopter discussion, the topic of
our future state Architecture came up… In slide 2, I am trying to capture
the post COSMOS 1.0, i.e. future state…. Some questions: 1.
Please confirm that the Domain will return. 2.
Will we support multiple instances of a given type of Broker? 3.
Will we support different types of Brokers? 4.
Will WSDM return? If so, will we address EACH
Broker via its own EPR? Please correct / update as appropriate, as this is purely my
own SWAG at what things could look like in future. Thanks, Jimmy
Mohsin Cell +1-609-635-1703 P.S. Please note that several of my documentation ER’s
require these answers… |
Attachment:
COSMOSArch.ppt
Description: COSMOSArch.ppt