Re: [cosmos-dev] Re: COSMOS download page

[Mark D Weitzel <weitzelm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bjorn,

We'd be happy to change whatever we
need (web, build, etc...) in order to be in compliance.  
When we had this discussion, I thought
we looked over the development guidelines but must have misinterpreted
something along the way.  Upon re-reading them though they seem clear
enough so I'm not sure where we got our wires crossed.....

We'll get this cleaned up.  Sorry
for the inconvenience.

-mw
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mark Weitzel | STSM | IBM Software Group | Tivoli | Autonomic Computing
| (919) 543 0625 | weitzelm@xxxxxxxxxx

Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/18/07 01:25 PM

Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[cosmos-dev] Re: COSMOS download page

David and the rest of the COSMOS team,
I'm sitting on an airplane, catching up on my email reading, and I found
this message. 
Unfortunately, you may not use the 0.x naming for milestones. Under
the Eclipse Development Process, 0.x (and N.x) naming is for official releases
- releases that have been reviewed under the IP process and through a community
Release Review. Interim milestones are named 0.xMy, e.g., 0.4M2 if you
have complete milestone 2 working towards release 0.4 or 1.0M2 if you have
completed milestone 2 working towards release 1.0.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to change your download page (and
build system?) to conform with the Eclipse naming scheme. (It is important
that we keep the semantic meaning of 0.x and N.x consistent for our larger
Eclipse community - thanks.)

- Bjorn

Subject: [cosmos-dev] COSMOS downloads page

From: David Whiteman <David_Whiteman@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:34:14 -0400

To: "Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I see that we have the i5 stable build featured on the page http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/downloads/
on the first tab as the latest release.  Do we want each stable iteration
build to be featured that way, or just the milestone builds?  Also,
I had thought at least we were reserving the Release 0.x naming for milestones?

I guess I was expecting the first tab to say Release 0.4 until the end
of milestone 2, at which point we would have Release 0.7 featured.

Thoughts? 

David 


_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev