[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
Re: [cobol-dev] Cobol in 3.1
|
- From: Jana Lingo <jana.lingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 17:35:09 -0700
- Delivered-to: cobol-dev@eclipse.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lxj1kXT1tcNRQdpZVyvDuDN0MwL8EImmD+bThQ/LkxSvmX0FYjmLlgS7EWMrH12MGTIE45nOeT5Nadv6ascgNWTbu8oPXvBRsKLkrILF8+hGW8+h5rxFpI1h+B/6XNb1KCId+UgtRYOiEO+p58O71s+7ih4fh1qZgJ/gHDlurt8=
I'm also
I am a senior COBOL programmer, who is attempting to stumble thru
Java. any ideas whree I shoud start?
On 5/20/05, James D Carroll <jamesdcarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm game.
> But I will tell you:
> I'm a pretty good Java programmer, not the best in the world, but competant.
> I've worked through the Eclipse Plugin book (Clayburg) and most of it made
> sense.
> I don't know COBOL, but I've always wanted to learn.
>
>
> Just tell me how I can help and maybe give a little guidance to get me
> started.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Benbenek, Waldyn J
> To: cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 1:06 PM
> Subject: [cobol-dev] Cobol in 3.1
>
>
>
>
> The cobol 3.0 source does not compile under 3.1. It has the usual set on
> incompatibilities.
>
>
>
> Is anyone going to upgrade it? I can help. Most of it is fairly
> straightforward.
>
>
>
> Waldyn
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobol-dev mailing list
> cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cobol-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobol-dev mailing list
> cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cobol-dev
>
>
>