Re: [cme-users] Extending queries

[Peri Tarr <tarr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Juri,

Nah, I think we've got you.  :-)
 If you mean you want the classes that define the calls to the Cosmos.execute(..)
methods, you want this query:

   containingType(call(* Cosmos.execute(..)))

On the other hand, if you're asking
for the classes that declare the Cosmos.execute(..) methods that are called
(as opposed to the classes that contain callers of Cosmos.execute(..)),
then you'd want to ask this differently (but see if you think a different
mechanism is also needed).  I'd first ask for the "calls"
relationships:

   <rels = relationship
calls(* *(..), * Cosmos.execute(..))>;

The targets of these relationships are
the called methods, rather than the callers (the callers are what the "call"
pointcut gives you--it's equivalent to sourceof(relationship calls(* *(..),
* Cosmos.execute(..)))), and you actually want the *targets*, not the sources).
 So you ask for the containingTypes of the targets to get the classes
that define the called methods:

   containingType(targetof(<rels>));

(or, written without the variable, "containingType(targetof(relationship
calls(* *(..), * Cosmos.execute(..))))".)

Does that help?

     Peri

Juri Memmert <memmert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cme-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/27/2004 01:57 PM

Please respond to
cme-users

To	CME Users <cme-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[cme-users] Extending queries

Hi,

on a related topic to my previous post, here's another issue.

Imagine I have a query to identify all calls to a method:

[1] "call( * Cosmos.execute(..))"

Now, I would like to extend the query to the classes which contain the
methods
matching this query.

How do I do that? Either it's one of the not-yet-implemented functions
or I
don't get it...


                
Juri


-----
Now that I have my "APPLE", I comprehend COST ACCOUNTING!!

_______________________________________________
cme-users mailing list
cme-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cme-users