Re: [cme-dev] Components/Owners for bugzilla?

[Stan Sutton <suttons@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think a Concern Model category would
be good.  Should we distinguish (or could we expect users to distinguish)
between concern-model issues in the Concern Explorer view versus problems
internal to the components?  I suppose that at least direct users
of the components would be able to tell internal problems from UI problems.

Stan

Sian Whiting1 <SWHITING@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: cme-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/22/2004 04:39 AM Please respond to cme-dev

To:        cme-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx         cc:                 Subject:        Re: [cme-dev] Components/Owners for bugzilla?

That looks good - I'm happy to own the UI piece.  What about a 'Concern
Model' category for any problems people have in the Concern Explorer?  Or
'Other' or a general 'Components' one for other bugs in the base?

Sian

Andrew Clement/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Sent by: cme-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

22/04/2004 09:24

Please respond to
cme-dev

To	cme-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[cme-dev] Components/Owners for bugzilla?

We need to determine the list of components and their owners for bugzilla
CME reporting/tracking.  At the moment we have one component 'CME'
and the default person who gets emailed for bugs raised against that component
is cme-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx (very useful!) 

I think we should name coarse grained areas - I can't initially see any
point in naming puma/conman/etc as individual components as the users/raisers
won't know which underlying code to pick.  So I was thinking of components
like: 

Docs 
User Interface 
Composition 
Query 

I need default component owners too - I was possibly thinking of Peri for
Query, BillH for Composition, Sian for User Interface and maybe Helen for
Docs.  Of course, these are only the initial contacts - they are perfectly
free to reassign the bugs as appropriate once they've done some initial
analysis. 

Comments? 

Andy. 

=== 
Andy Clement 
CME Development