Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 05:06:25 +0000
Accept-language: en-CA, en-US
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHTCXi1474wSkmuXUOPkoOSByadRKJtCmbOgAAHGH6AAEMX5YAAoOLQgAQjsiQ=
Thread-topic: Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

Thanks for your thoughts Doug.

> my gut tells me it may actually be less work to start a new editor

Just to make sure I'm understanding correctly: do you mean a new editor to combine editor functions powered by LSP with editor functions powered by our existing parser, or a new editor for LSP functionality only?

Thanks,
Nate

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Doug Schaefer

References:
- [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Nathan Ridge
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Marc-André Laperle
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Nathan Ridge
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Marc-André Laperle
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] Committer vote for John Dallaway has been approved by the PMC
Next by Date: [cdt-dev] forum or cdt-dev?
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs