Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Core Build for 9.2

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Felix,

The code is the best place to look. Sounds like you have a good
understanding of what¹s left to do. There isn¹t a lot there right now
other than the Core Build integration.

At the moment, I don¹t have plans to work on it for a while so feel free
to contribute where you like. Jesper was working on a CMake server
integration but I¹ll let him speak to the state of that.

Thanks, we definitely appreciate the help.
Doug.

On 2017-05-29, 9:58 AM, "cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Morgner
Felix" <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of felix.morgner@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Hi Doug
>
>First off, I would be very interested in working on the CMake support for
>CDT. I
>currently work at the Institute for Software (HSR) while doing my MSc
>part-time. 
>Next semester, my first term-project is coming up and while discussing
>possible
>projects, we came across the CDT CMake integration.
>
>I have played around with it a little bit, and it seems like there are
>still
>some things to implement, like source file management, syntax
>highlighting and
>semantic completion.
>
>I was wondering if you (or anyone else) could point me at an overview of
>the
>current state of the project, as well as what features are planned or
>other
>design notes, so that I get an idea of who is working on what features
>and what
>areas I could contribute to. This would allow me to see if the scope
>would be
>sufficiently large for a term-project and I could formulate a project
>proposal.
>
>Thanks,
>Felix
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Corbat Thomas <thomas.corbat@xxxxxx>
>To: Morgner Felix <felix.morgner@xxxxxx>
>Subject: FW: [cdt-dev] Core Build for 9.2
>Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:24:14 +0200
>
>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf
>Of Doug Schaefer
>Sent: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 16:32
>To: CDT General developers list. <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Core Build for 9.2
> 
>Hey Mark, good to hear from you.
> 
>I think for the most part CMake is working. I demoed it at a ESE Kongress
>a
>couple of months ago so gave it a good work out. Feel free to give it a
>try and
>see if there¹s anything missing that you may need.
> 
>I have an example here of how I used it for the ESP8266 micro controller
>and
>it¹s FreeRTOS SDK. I really like how it turned out and showed me how good
>CMake
>is for things like this.
> 
>    https://github.com/dschaefer/dasESP
> 
>I don¹t think we need anything formal. We can certainly talk about it at
>the
>next CDT call. Our Mattermost channel is also a good vehicle for more
>immediate
>discussions.
> 
>    https://mattermost.eclipse.org/eclipse/channels/cdt-developers
>
>
>I¹m not planning on working on it the next few weeks as we¹re in crunch
>mode
>with our next QNX product release coming up. So if there¹s something you
>see
>that needs to be fixed or worked on, please raise a bug in Bugzilla and
>we can
>discuss things there. I do receive all new CDT Bugzilla reports so will
>keep an
>eye out for them.
> 
>Also if anyone else is interested in working on our CMake integration,
>please
>respond so we can co-ordinate.
> 
>Cheers,
>Doug.
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev