Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Windows XP support

If we have an urgent need to clean up our bug list, sure. We support what contributors want to support. If someone comes along, they can reopen the bugs I guess.

FWIW, I’m not sure we ever declared that we did support it ;). Same with Mac which is actually questionable at this point, at least until M-A gets lldb-mi working.

:D, it’s Friday.

From: <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Windows XP support

+1

I think this is a fair way forward.


If MS does not support XP, it's hard to blame us for not supporting it:

https://support.microsoft.com/en-ca/help/14223/windows-xp-end-of-support


Marc


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Marc-André Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: October 14, 2016 3:36 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Windows XP support
 

Hi,


We've come across a bug that happens only on Windows XP. It made me wonder if we should more officially declare that some environments are not supported anymore. What that would mean is that we would closed/wontfix some of those bugs and if someone wants to step up and fix the issue, we could reopen it.


So, is there any objection to considering Windows XP as "not supported" anymore?

Is there any objection to mark bugs closed/wontfix for platforms considered unsupported unless someone steps up?


Regards,

Marc-Andre


Back to the top