Re: [cdt-dev] C/C++ Problem Markers question

[Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>]

OK.. add to list to fix in cdt 9, would be API breaking probably because errors parsers do not API to deal with columns at all

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

It’s probably historical. I don’t think gcc gave column information 10+ years ago when we started.

Doug.

From: <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx" <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cdt-dev] C/C++ Problem Markers question

Anybody remembers/knows why we don't support marker character position

for problem markers? Java problems for example highlight only the part

of string relevant to an error while cdt all line. Our error parser

ignores gcc column information and even our marker generator API that

suppose to set column actually ignores it and set -1. So anybody knows why?