[cdt-dev] CPPClassInstance vs CPPClassSpecialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] CPPClassInstance vs CPPClassSpecialization

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 13:27:24 -0700
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Does anybody know why B<0> in the following code gets resolved to CPPClassInstance instead of CPPClassSpecialization?

struct A {};

template <int V>

struct B {};

template <>

struct B<0> : A {};

This doesn't look right and is possibly a contributing factor for the StackOverflowError in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=466362.

-sergey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CPPClassInstance vs CPPClassSpecialization
  - From: Nathan Ridge

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] Reminder for CDT conf call in 30 min (http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/calls)
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CPPClassInstance vs CPPClassSpecialization
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Reminder for CDT conf call in 30 min (http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/calls)
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CPPClassInstance vs CPPClassSpecialization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top