Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Indexer regression between SR1 and SR2

You’d think the 30 unresolved inclusions would be the bigger issue. Sergey, is your number with a super low or zero missing inclusions number?

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 12:45 PM
To: Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Indexer regression between SR1 and SR2

I'm constantly monitoring indexer on my large codebase and haven't seen any regression. It's not feasible to investigate issues described in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=457511 without access to the code base being indexed. Having said that, it is likely that the project in question is not configured properly since 0.45% of unresolved names is way too high. I'm getting 0.0031% on my code base. 

-sergey

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There seems to be indexer regression between SR1 and SR2.
Sergey can you look at it?

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=457511

SR1:
Indexed 'xxxx' (541 sources, 2,391 headers) in 119 sec: 317,902 declarations; 1,029,311 references; 30 unresolved inclusions; 26 syntax errors; 6,117 unresolved names (0.45%)

SR2:
Indexed 'xxxx' (541 sources, 2,391 headers) in 129 sec: 317,902 declarations; 1,027,718 references; 30 unresolved inclusions; 26 syntax errors; 7,161 unresolved names (0.53%)


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top