Re: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long

From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:31:32 +0000
Accept-language: en-US, en-CA
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHQKPaagBl7ZoBw6Eq22eltYOiTtZyxp2sA
Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117

I think it was on a bug. If no one remembers, I have no problem with it.

Doug.

From: Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx" <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, January 5, 2015 at 9:47 AM
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long

I added an API to construct Addr64 from long, Doug mentions that where was some discussions about it long time ago that it is not good idea. I cannot find any discussion about it in archives.

I am not sure why it could be possible bad any-how?

This is review
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/38496

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long
  - From: Guy Bonneau

References:
- [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long
  - From: Alena Laskavaia

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] cdt-dev Digest, Vol 119, Issue 1
Next by Date: [cdt-dev] Conf Call Tomorrow
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Addr64 from long
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs