[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Resolving overloaded 'operator ()' binding
|
I agree, we should have a public API ICPPASTFunctionCallExpression.getOverload().
Could you file a bug for this?
Thanks,
Nate
________________________________
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:17:29 +0400
> From: dmitrynpetrov@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Resolving overloaded 'operator ()' binding
>
> ...Ok, CPPASTFunctionCallExpression#getOverload() does it.
>
> Looks like it should be a part of ICPPASTFunctionCallExpression.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Petrov
> <dmitrynpetrov@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmitrynpetrov@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Suppose I have an ICPPASTFunctionCallExpression expression representing
> overloaded 'operator ()' call.
>
> Finding proper 'operator()' binding can get quite tough with all
> overloads, implicit casts, and so on.
> I suppose CDT does something about it (otherwise it would be unable to
> perform type check for such expressions, and resolve bindings that
> depend on the type of this expression).
>
> The same question can be applied to other overloaded operator calls
> that are represented as "regular" expressions in CDT AST.
> For ICPPASTBinaryExpression (and so on), the answer is
> ICPPASTBinaryExpression#getOverload().
> Unfortunately, there's no similar method in ICPPASTFunctionCallExpression.
>
> Is there any code in CDT that could be reused?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your
> password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
