Re: [cdt-dev] support for remote autotools

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>]

I’ve been thinking more of the IDE project over the last few days. I think
we can get that started in a month or two. I’ve been busy getting the
Eclipse on JavaFX off the ground first. But that’s probably the best
choice.

Not sure of the namespace, we’ll see what kind of rules the EMO would like
to see. Generally they prefer the project name in the namespace. But at
this point, I’m not 100% sure it’ll be ‘ide’.

Doug.

On 1/21/2014, 3:26 PM, "Greg Watson" <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I’m ok with that, though a separate IDE project would probably be better.
>I’ve also already refactored the packages to org.eclipse.remote.* so I’d
>prefer not to change these again. Is that an issue?
>
>Regards,
>Greg
>
>On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Do we want to bring that down into the CDT (and make you a committer?
>>;).
>> 
>> I still have on my list of things to do is to create an IDE project
>>where
>> we can put more general things like this but that¹s probably a few
>>months
>> away.
>> 
>> Doug.
>> 
>> On 1/20/2014, 8:49 AM, "Greg Watson" <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> As a result of the summit last year, I separated the remote API out of
>>> PTP into it¹s own repo and namespace with no other PTP dependencies. I
>>> also provided an implementation directly on JSch. I hope this provides
>>> enough incentive for it to be used by other projects.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Greg
>>> 
>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> As the maintainer of the CDT Autotools plug-ins, if you are proposing
>>>> making the Autotools
>>>> plug-in remote-enabled by replacing existing calls with the new PTP
>>>> platform
>>>> APIs (i.e. no external dependencies), I wouldn't have issues
>>>> as long as existing functionality is preserved. Any API,
>>>>functionality,
>>>> or UI changes, however, would require closer scrutiny.
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed that Rafael M. posted to the ptp-dev list in March
>>>> of 2013 to offer help in adding PTP Autotools remote project support.
>>>> Perhaps you
>>>> could team up with him such that you could make changes to the
>>>> Autotools plug-ins
>>>> and he could add support on the RDT side if something isn't already in
>>>> the works
>>>> in PTP.
>>>> 
>>>> If you were instead planning on reviving my old proposal which used
>>>>the
>>>> project location, that would require buy-in from Doug.  That proposal
>>>> was turned down,
>>>> even though it removed the external dependencies on RDT/RSE via proxy.
>>>> I should note that
>>>> I did bring it up for discussion at the 2013 CDT Summit and it didn't
>>>> gain any traction
>>>> though Greg Watson proposed creating the new platform interfaces.  You
>>>> would need a more
>>>> detailed proposal to get the right people's attention and approval.
>>>> There is the up-coming
>>>> 2014 CDT Summit at EclipseCon if you are planning on attending.
>>>> 
>>>> -- Jeff J. 
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo" <rfaraujo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 7:23:12 AM
>>>>> Subject: [cdt-dev] support for remote autotools
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> From what I am aware, there is not any support for remote operations
>>>>> into Autotools.  Im planning to implement this support by making use
>>>>>of
>>>>> the interface developed by the PTP team. They managed to make it
>>>>> independent of any remote services implementation, which imo would
>>>>> be ideal for such case
>>>>> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/PTP/designs/remote/API).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there anyone already working on this? Would this contribution be
>>>>> welcomed by the CDT community?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Rodrigo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev