Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Proposed Schedule for 8.3 and 8.4

BTW, any other comments on the proposed schedule before we make it the
plan of record?

Doug.

On 13-07-30 10:59 AM, "Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hmm, great point. I don't think we're doing anything that relies on 4.x
>yet so I don't think that's an issue.
>
>On 13-07-30 10:34 AM, "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>There is an expectation that CDT Kepler is compatible with Eclipse 3.8 so
>>Kepler SR2 should also be compatible with 3.8.
>>
>>If you want to promote CDT 8.3.1 into the Release train, it would thus
>>have to be compatible with Eclipse 3.8 too.
>>I'd personally be in favor of that, but I'm not sure if all others on CDT
>>are in line ?
>> 
>>Thanks,
>>Martin
>>--
>>Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind
>>River
>>direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:49 PM
>>To: CDT General developers list.
>>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Proposed Schedule for 8.3 and 8.4
>>
>>I'm leaning that way too. We can do an 8.2.2 in the same time frame, at
>>least build and publish it, for those interested. But yeah, I like the
>>idea of pushing 8.3.1 to the Kepler SR-2. There doesn't seem to be any
>>restriction on that (Egit is pushing new releases every SR, for example).
>>
>>BTW, no rush. I'm on holidays too from Aug 1-14. So as long as we slowly
>>firm up between now and when I get back we'll be ready to go.
>>
>>On 13-07-24 4:44 PM, "Marc-André Laperle"
>><marc-andre.laperle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:41:08 -0400
>>>Marc-André Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for looking into that. This schedule looks good. For SR2, I
>>>> think it would probably be simpler to do a 8.3.1 or else we would
>>>> have 3 active branches for a while (assuming we would be doing a
>>>> 8.3.1 before June). We could still back port fixes to the 8.2 branch
>>>> on demand like we do for older branches right now.
>>>
>>>> With that in mind,
>>>> would it be OK to contribute CDT 8.3.1 to the Kepler release train
>>>> for SR2?
>>>
>>>
>>>I mean, from the C/C++ EPP perspective.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Marc-Andre
>>>> 
>>>> (BTW, I think Marc K will likely want to comment on the schedule but
>>>> he's on vacation right now this week and next week, I believe)
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 04:01:15 +0000
>>>> Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > Hey gang,
>>>> > 
>>>> > To follow up on our plan to switch to 6 month releases, I plotted
>>>> > out a possible schedule. These dates are release dates on the
>>>> > Friday with the builds from Tues (plus any respins).
>>>> > 
>>>> > Fri, Aug 23 - CDT 8.2 SR1 RC1
>>>> > Fri, Sep 06 - CDT 8.2 SR1 RC2
>>>> > Fri, Sep 13 - CDT 8.2 SR1 RC3
>>>> > Fri, Sep 20 - CDT 8.2 SR1 RC4
>>>> > 
>>>> > Fri, Aug 23 - CDT 8.3 M1
>>>> > Fri, Sep 27 - CDT 8.3 M2
>>>> > Fri, Oct 25 - CDT 8.3 M3
>>>> > Fri, Nov 22 - CDT 8.3 RC1
>>>> > Fri, Nov 29 - CDT 8.3 RC2
>>>> > Fri, Dec 06 - CDT 8.3 RC3
>>>> > Fri, Dec 13 - CDT 8.3 RC4
>>>> > 
>>>> > Also trying not to release just before the holiday week in Dec.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Kepler SR-1 is in sync with the train.
>>>> > 
>>>> > The milestones for 8.3 are 4 weeks, as opposed to 6 weeks that are
>>>> > traditional with Eclipse. We would put the latest available CDT
>>>> > into the train milestone builds (M1-3) with the final 8.3 going into
>>>>M4.
>>>> > 
>>>> > For 8.4, I think we'd probably line up again with the Eclipse train
>>>> > milestones with Luna starting with M5.
>>>> > 
>>>> > What happens for Kepler SR-2 is a good question. It releases at the
>>>> > end of Feb with RC's starting Jan 23. We could do 8.3.1 for then on
>>>> > a shortened SR schedule. Or do an 8.2.2 with minimal changes.
>>>> > Depends on whether we want to step on the gas, or go for stability.
>>>> > 
>>>> > BTW, Eclipse train schedules here:
>>>> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Kepler/Simultaneous_Release_Plan
>>>> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Luna/Simultaneous_Release_Plan
>>>> > 
>>>> > Comments?
>>>> > Doug.
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



Back to the top