| Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey |
|
I use the snapshot from cdt-nightly and the issues reported in the mentioned bug have in fact been fixed. So this seems to be a new situation.
Michi
On Friday 19 Jul 2013 16:06:33 xgsa wrote: > Hi, > > In spite of your question was to Nathan, I'll try to help. What version of CDT do you use? It looks like a bug 403418 [1] that was fixed in the latest CDT. > > > [1] - Bug 403418 - Type Hierarchy view does not show class templates - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=403418 > > > Anton. > > -------- Original message -------- > Hi Nathan, > > I've created a test file (it might be a bit > cluttered, sorry). In the main method I put in some comments. > Can you verify and suggest in which category these problems > fall? > What should be done about the b20.test() > linker problem? I know codan is extensible, but I have no clue > how I personally can fix that quickly. > > thx Michi > > /* > * test1.hpp > * > * Created on: 19 Jul 2013 > * Author: michi > */ > > #ifndef TEST1_HPP_ > #define TEST1_HPP_ > > #include <iostream> > #include <string> > > struct AA { > > void aa() { > > } > > void print() { > std::cout << "AA"; > } > > }; > > struct BB { > > void bb() { > > } > > void print() { > std::cout << "BB"; > } > > }; > > struct CC { > > void cc() { > std::cout << "CC"; > } > > }; > > template<int _Switch_> > struct B: public std::conditional<_Switch_ > >= 10, AA, BB>::type { > > void test(); > > }; > > template<> > struct B<5> : public AA, public CC { > > }; > > int main() { > B<0> b0; // Type Hierarchy not > resolved > B<5> b5; // open declaration does not > point to specialization; Type Hierarchy not resolved (again no > specialization) > B<20> b20; // Type Hierarchy not > resolved > b0.bb() // code completion works - uses > proper conditional > b5.cc(); // code completion works - uses > specialization > b20.test(); // this is off topic, but I > think it should generate a warning (linker problem) - unnoticed > when building a library > b20.aa(); // code completion works - uses > proper conditional > } > > #endif /* TEST1_HPP_ */ > On Thursday 18 Jul 2013 19:29:12 Nathan Ridge > wrote: > > >> How about "support for > C++11/C++14 language features"? > > > +1000 > > > evaluating enable_if<..> et > al. would be such a boon > > If by evaluating you mean performing > overload resolutioncorrectly in the presence of enable_if, that > should alreadywork. If it doesn't, please file bugs and I will > fix them. > > Thanks,Nate > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdt-dev mailing list > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev > > > |