Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey

From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:29:12 +0000
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

>> How about "support for C++11/C++14 language features"?

> +1000

> evaluating enable_if<..> et al. would be such a boon

If by evaluating you mean performing overload resolution

correctly in the presence of enable_if, that should already

work. If it doesn't, please file bugs and I will fix them.

Thanks,

Nate

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
  - From: scalpel4k

References:
- [cdt-dev] CDT survey
  - From: Marc-Andre Laperle
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
  - From: Nathan Ridge
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
  - From: scalpel4k

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT survey
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top