[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Visibility Information of Nested Classes in Index
|
I created a bug report, although I'm not sure if I used the proper component
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=403418
thx Michi
On Friday 15 Mar 2013 08:05:41 Corbat Thomas wrote:
> Thanks for the example. I see the problem. To me it seems more likely that it is a problem regarding the resolution of the template instance as a base type, rather than the visibility of the nested class. Especially as for E derived from A<int> the hierarchy is not displayed as well.
>
> If I add a class H derived from E, the hierarchy on H stops at E. Therefore, I expect it to be a bug in the Type Hierarchy view. Could you create a bug for that?
>
> Thanks
> -Thomas
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of scalpel4k
> Sent: Freitag, 15. März 2013 08:42
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Visibility Information of Nested Classes in Index
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> in the attached file try F4 for classes D ... G and you will see the difference.
>
> bye Michi
>
> On Friday 15 Mar 2013 07:17:00 Corbat Thomas wrote:
> > Hi Michi
> >
> > Currently, I can't imagine a direct correlation of the missing nested type visibility and unexpected output in the type hierarchy. But could you explain the output you are observing compared to what you are expecting? Best with an example.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of scalpel4k
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 14. März 2013 18:51
> > To: cdt general developers list.
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] Visibility Information of Nested Classes in Index
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question with respect to the following bug:
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=402878
> >
> > Is the described issue there also the reason why I do not get any reasonable output from the Type Hierarchy view? In that case, I just wanted to raise the attention for that additional problem.
> >
> > bye Michi
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
