Re: [cdt-dev] bindings for CPPASTNewExpression

[Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Resolving T in new T to a constructor is problematic. Consider the  
> following example: 
>  
> [snip]
>
> I think we should follow the option #1 despite of the fact that it may  
> break some existing code that depends on resolving "new T" to a ctor  
> call. Formally this is not an API change since IASTName.resolveBinding  
> does not make a promise of what kind of binding the name resolves to. 

Thanks for your advice! I'm working on implementing option #1.

I filed https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398706 to track
the issue

Regards,
Nate