OK. I have bumped cdt maintain to 180.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
We'll have to see. It seems longer on Hudson than on my machine. Should be a little over 2 hours total according to the previous attempts.
Let's try one and discuss further once we know.
Thanks
Marc
----- Original Message -----
From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
To: "cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'CDT General developers list.'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 11-01-2013 16:40
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
How much longer does this make the builds?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Doug or Vivian, can you extend the build timeout on Hudson to 180 minutes?
Thanks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Khouzam
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:25 PM
> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
>
> Things are looking better now, but the new tests make
> the build longer than the configured built time limit.
>
> I don't have permissions to change that value.
>
> Doug, can you set the hudson job to only time out
> after 180 minutes?
>
> Thanks
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Khouzam
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:46 AM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> >
> > It was pointed-out to me that we are trying to build 32bit
> > apps (-m32) with a 64bit lib.
> > I will try to remove the -m32 to see if that helps. I'm not
> > entirely sure why we force -m32.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Marc Khouzam
> > [marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: January 9, 2013 11:51 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> >
> > Looks like there is a problem with libstdc++. The errors are below:
> >
> > [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.3:run (prepare) @
> > org.eclipse.cdt.tests.dsf.gdb ---
> > [INFO] Executing tasks
> >
> > makeTestApps:
> > [exec]
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-l
> > inux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/libstdc++.so when
> > searching for -lstdc++
> > [exec]
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-l
> > inux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/libstdc++.a when
> > searching for -lstdc++
> > [exec]
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-l
> > inux/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++
> > [exec] collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > [...]
> > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 1
> > [exec] Result: 2
> >
> > Also, Iooking at the Makefile that builds the test
> > applications, we'll need to modify it because
> > it also requires GDB to be in the path. For convenience here
> > is the Makefile from cdt.tests.dsf.gdb/data/launch/src/Makefile
> >
> > src = "" *.cc *.c)
> > destDir = ../bin
> > GCCFLAGS = -gdwarf-2 -pthread -m32
> >
> > all:
> > @mkdir -p $(destDir)
> > # Name the target with an .exe extension so that CVS does not
> > # include it when making a patch
> > @for file in $(src) ; \
> > do \
> > target=`basename $$file .c` ; \
> > target=`basename $$target .cc` ; \
> > g++ $(GCCFLAGS) $$file -o
> $(destDir)/$$target.exe ; \
> > done
> > # Now generate the core file that we need for the post-mortem
> > core-file tests
> > @gdb --nx --batch -ex "b testLocals" -ex run -ex
> > "next 16" -ex "gcore ../bin/core" \
> > ../bin/ExpressionTestApp.exe > /dev/null
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Doug Schaefer
> > [dschaefer@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: January 9, 2013 4:41 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> >
> > OK, got gdb hooked up to the tests and the try to run. But it
> > looks like they all fail. Any thoughts?
> >
> > https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/me/my-views/view/CDT/job/cdt
> > -maint/364/testReport/
> >
> > D
> >
> > From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx<mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxx>>
> > Reply-To: "CDT General developers list."
> > <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Date: Friday, 4 January, 2013 1:44 PM
> > To: "cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>"
> > <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> >
> > Got side tracked a little by an ugly scanner discovery bug
> > but will get to this right after.
> >
> > :D
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> >
> > From: Marc Khouzam
> > Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 1:04 PM
> > To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> > Reply To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > any success about this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:
> > cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:49 AM
> > > To: CDT General developers list.
> > > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> > >
> > > On 12-12-20 11:44 AM, "Marc Khouzam"
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From:
> > cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:25 AM
> > > >> To: CDT General developers list.
> > > >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> > > >>
> > > >> That only holds for that shell, not the maven job.
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't mind adding a property. Do know off hand where this
> > > >> check is made?
> > > >
> > > >The name of the gdb binary to be used is set in:
> > > >org.eclipse.cdt.tests.dsf.gdb.framework.BaseTestCase#setGdbPr
> > > ogramNamesLau
> > > >nchAttributes()
> > > >
> > > >Thinking about it, using a property would allow people to
> > > leave their PATH
> > > >alone and use the property themselves.
> > >
> > > Definitely a positive side effect of this.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Another option that was suggested to me was to have maven
> > > download the
> > > >pre-built
> > > >gdb from some location. This would make the solution
> > > slave-independent.
> > > >But
> > > >where to store this gdb so it could be downloaded...
> > >
> > > All slaves can see our staging directory where the final bits
> > > are placed
> > > so that should be safe.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >The property sounds like a quick and good solution.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks for taking care of this!
> > >
> > > No problem. We need to step up our involvement in this to
> > > make sure our
> > > user base is happy with our common debugger experience.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Marc
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12-12-20 11:20 AM, "Marc Khouzam"
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Thanks Doug!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >As you mention, the JUnit tests look for gdb in PATH. The
> > > >> name of GDB
> > > >> >must include the version.
> > > >> >If you installed gdb 7.5 or 7.5.1, gdb must be named gdb.7.5
> > > >> >
> > > >> >How about adding a build step in Hudson to "Execute shell"
> > > >> and set the
> > > >> >PATH variable?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Marc
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >________________________________
> > > >> >
> > > >> > From:
> > cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >> >On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:04 AM
> > > >> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > > >> > Subject: [cdt-dev] gdb for testing on hudson
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This is mainly for Marc but I'm sure others are
> interested too.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've *finally* got gdb built so that it can run on the
> > > >> Eclipse servers.
> > > >> >They run SuSE linux which is just different enough to make
> > > >> it complicated.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > At any rate, how do I now integrate it into our build?
> > > >> Setting the path
> > > >> >is going to be complicated in Hudson. Do we have a property
> > > >> I can set to
> > > >> >point at it? Should we add one?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks!
> > > >> > :D
> > > >> >
> > > >> >_______________________________________________
> > > >> >cdt-dev mailing list
> > > >> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> cdt-dev mailing list
> > > >> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > > >>
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >cdt-dev mailing list
> > > >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdt-dev mailing list
> > > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
