Re: [cdt-dev] 8.0.2 branch

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>]

Yes, we would still like a bug report where we can record any conversation
about the request independent of the actual code.

Cheers,
Doug.

BTW, I'm running into a pretty nasty bug in egit that's preventing me from
looking at history in 8.0.2 so I can set the tag from there. Anyone else
seeing excessive "Re-indexing repository org.eclipse.cdt" messages in the
progress?

On 12-05-10 2:01 PM, "Jason Litton" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Thanks Doug,
>I just pulled head, and it gave me what I needed to know. I was also
>wondering, now that CDT is using git and gerrit, do changes still need to
>be linked to a specific bug in bugzilla? I was looking at adding a minor
>visibility change in GdbLaunchDelegate and some empty methods in
>GDBControl that allow for logging of Gdb Traces and was wondering if I
>needed to open a bug on them first.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
>To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:56:25 AM
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] 8.0.2 branch
>
>I assume you mean tag. At any rate, checking back through the cdt-dev
>list, I see that the 8.0.2 was built from commit
>d39f64adfb1570f6be9f07a636d4d2a1bf781562.
>
>Doug.
>
>On 12-05-10 12:32 PM, "Jason Litton" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>I know the 8.0.2 branch isn't marked as such, so I was wondering which
>>branch I should check out in git to get the 8.0.2 code. I was going to
>>run some compatibility tests today and maybe push a couple of patches up.
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev