Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Extension-less headers versus Binaries

On 08/05/2012 1:18 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Hey gang,

I'm wondering if anyone has thought or dealt with this. I'm looking at Qt and it has a lot of extension-less headers. Now I could create a contentType extension that lists all of these files as cxxHeaders. However, if the user creates a binary with the same name, the BinaryRunner will skip over them because it thinks it's a header file.

First of all, I find it odd that the BinaryRunner is running over the entire project instead of just looking at the output folders. If the scope was restricted like that then we could try every file (or at least extension-less files) and see if it's a binary.


Does it run on the entire project even when changing the refresh scope? (Beware of the issues mentioned in Bug 375859 though). In bug 364027 it was suggested to check the executable flag but I haven't tried that yet.

Marc-Andre

Any thoughts?
Doug


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top