[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools version
- From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:57:54 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US, en-CA
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AQHNGakYZ+Krc8uXnkSn5qc+juDwzpafydWAgADZrwA=
- Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] Autotools version
Yeah, that's probably the correct approach. The general rule of thumb is
that we should be upversioning the second digit if new features are added
to a plug-in. Given the renaming, I'd say that qualifies. I'd almost
consider it a first digit change since it's a pretty major API change,
assuming you had APIs to begin with.
On 12-04-17 4:59 PM, "Jeff Johnston" <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>This is the first CDT version of the plug-in so the release number is
>arbitrary. I'm ok with bumping it up to 1.1.0 if that brings it in line
>with all other plug-ins.
>Doug, any comments?
>-- Jeff J.
>On 04/13/2012 03:07 PM, Sergey Prigogin wrote:
>> The org.eclipse.cdt.autotools.core plugin has version 1.0.2, which is
>> odd for a non-maintenance release. Should we change it to 1.1.0? Other
>> autotools plugins and the feature also have non-round versions.
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev mailing list