[cdt-dev] Speaking of API compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Speaking of API compatibility

From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:32:39 -0500
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHM97gnuCCFA25Ikky7C4EF2+j4Jw==
Thread-topic: Speaking of API compatibility

Since we're on the topic of being backwards-compatible.

I don't have much experience on how vendors extend the CDT,
so it is not clear to me if our move from Java 5 to Java 6 is 
backwards-compatible for them?

Thanks

Marc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Speaking of API compatibility
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] API tooling errors
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] [ptp-dev] Screen-cast of Remote Project Prototype Demo
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Outline has "pending" for a long time
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Speaking of API compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs