[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:16:40 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcztHjExoR41L5wsRhur+Jp7kLqXUQABF+U7
- Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] Gerrit
I totally agree with M-A on this. The discussions on Bugzilla are extremely valuable.
I'm suddenly worried about using Gerrit, now that M-A brings up this point.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marc-Andre Laperle <malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 16-02-2012 21:45
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Gerrit
Gerrit looks great! My only concern is that it could move too much of
the discussions from Bugzilla to Gerrit. Often when I look at EGit bugs,
I don't see a lot of activity and updates and then I find out everything
is happening on Gerrit. If we adopt it, I think we should make sure
Bugzilla is not too left out.
On 13/02/2012 2:32 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> Hey gang,
> Gerrit is ready for us to use! Woo hoo!
> I haven't taken a look at how to set it up and what it means to our
> processes. But it's something that should make our lives easier when
> accepting contributions. Let me know what you think and whether and we
> we should adopt it.
> cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list