Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 9?

[Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It looks like Andrew did a great job preserving the backward compatibility. We can stay with 8.1.

I was trying to come up with best API I am able to. In the process, to much of my surprise, incompatible API got reduced to none. Thanks for noting, Sergey.

As far as product release numbering in general, normally it is product/marketing decision and does not have to match plugins versions. I leave it to Doug provided he does not downgrade the version number.

Thanks,

Andrew

-sergey

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm leaning back to CDT 8.1. Anyone disagree with that? I'd like to
make the call next week when I'm back home.

D

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Lai, Winnie <wlai@xxxxxx> wrote:
> The changes that I need to make is NOT a breaking change.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:54 AM
> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 9?
>
> If you have the API tool enabled, it will tell you
> which change requires a major number increase:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/policy#Using_API_Tooling
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:47 AM
>> To: CDT General developers list.
>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 9?
>>
>> It's a break if client plugins must implement it. E.g., if
>> you added a
>> new interface to the implements list of an abstract public
>> class that's
>> not marked @noextend
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 2/10/2012 7:22 AM, Lai, Winnie wrote:
>> > I need to add a new API, does it count as a break?
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc-Andre Laperle
>> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 6:45 PM
>> > To: CDT General developers list.
>> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 9?
>> >
>> > Is anyone planning to change the API? I think if there is
>> no need then
>> > we should keep 8.1. It would give the wrong message to increment the
>> > version to 9.0 if there is no breaking change.
>> >
>> > Marc-Andre
>> >
>> > On 08/02/2012 2:42 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Marc
>> Khouzam<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> No objections from me, but I think we should justify the
>> decision. I'm sure some vendors will want to understand.
>> >>>
>> >>> What made up your mind?
>> >>>
>> >> It's time to decide and out of habit. I still highly
>> recommend you do
>> >> not make API changes. I'm going out of my way with the new project
>> >> wizard not to change any of the template and build APIs,
>> for example.
>> >>
>> >> But I am waiting for someone with a strong opinion to keep
>> it 8.1...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Marc
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: Doug Schaefer<cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> To: "CDT General developers list."<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> Sent: 07-02-2012 22:13
>> >>> Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT 9?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Any objections to calling the next release (and numbering
>> all of the
>> >>> features) as CDT 9.0? Please raise them by the weekend.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>> Doug.
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev