Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Potential Bug in CDT Variables Tab

Other double variables bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=327621
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=368565
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=210976

Someone should sort those out :-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elmenthaler, Jens
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:53 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Potential Bug in CDT Variables Tab
> 
> This looks like bug 328573. Under certain circumstances gdb 
> returns multiple variables with the same name within the same 
> stack frame. Normally that happens if a local scope hides a 
> variable in the parent scope.
> 
> The question now is whether you use DSF or CDI. For DSF, this 
> should be fixed, for CDI I don't know.
> 
> Open the launch configuration dialog and select your launch 
> configuration. If the bottom of the page says something like 
> "Using GDB (DSF)...", you are using DSF, and your problem is 
> a bug that should be reported and investigated.
> 
> Otherwise you are using CDI and you just might want to select DSF.
> 
> Jens.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Jason Litton
> > Sent: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012 18:33
> > To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] Potential Bug in CDT Variables Tab
> > 
> > Hello,
> > I believe I have discovered a bug in CDT views. I was trying to set
> > watchpoints in a ram stage debug, and I got doubled variables in the
> > variable view (see attached screen shot). If I try to click 
> on one of
> > these variables in order to set a watchpoint, the 
> highlighting flickers
> > rapidly between the two variables and a watchpoint can't be 
> set. The code
> > being debugged looks like:
> > 
> > void foo(int boot_complete);
> > 
> > void foo(int boot_complete)
> > {
> > //do stuff
> > }
> > 
> > Looking at a GDB console, I can see that GDB is only aware 
> of one variable
> > named boot_complete, so it appears there's something 
> strange in the CDT
> > handling code. I was just wondering if this is a known 
> issue or if it's
> > something that a bug should be filed on.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jason Litton
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 

Back to the top