Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:09:42 -0500
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

> While you are at it, will gcov and gprof be moved too?

There are currently no plans to do so.  If we want to talk about a
full-scale annexing of Linux Tools by CDT then those make sense :)

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
  - From: Schaefer, Doug

References:
- [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
  - From: Schaefer, Doug
- Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
  - From: kesselhaus

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs