[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF RSE
|
Cool, I'm psychic :)
Our current master build specifies CDT Indigo in the top-level pom.xml
file. This obviously needs to change. The tcf,rse fix will definitely
help.
Thanks,
-- Jeff J.
On 10/26/2011 11:50 AM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
LOL. I had just checked in the change to get the tcf.rse feature into the CDT nightly build. You must be looking over my shoulder :)
Do you guys build against our nightly build or what's in the Juno repo? I'm trying to decide whether to update the CDT for Juno now or later. I'd rather do it during our slot on Monday.
:D
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Cc: Schaefer, Doug
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
TCF RSE
Doug is this resolved?
-- Jeff J.
On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
Cheers,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of J. Johnston
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
missing TCF RSE
On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
To: 'CDT General developers list.'
Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
to missing TCF RSE
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
to missing TCF RSE
Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train has
only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC debugger.
RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the past,
it was by accident.
Now, that'll change for Juno
So CDT will require RSE? I'm happy about this as it makes remote
debug launches more user-friendly.
I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency though.
Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote launch
already
depends on RSE.
The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the release
train,
or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so
client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
Doug
We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term as
M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th. Is there an issue with at least
including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up with a better
long-term solution?
-- Jeff J.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
