Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6

There were known bugs in 1.6 update 23 and 1.6 update 24. However, 1.6u25 and onwards solved that particular problem. I haven't seen any problems since.

This is the Sun bug report:


It notes that a fix was delivered in 6u25 and 7b123. However, I think it's 

On 18 Oct 2011, at 19:22, Alexiev, Dobrin wrote:

The bug exists since 1.6.14 up until the latest JRE.
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:13 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
 
That bug talks about 1.7, no? I don’t go anywhere near 1.7. The quality has been horrible.
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexiev, Dobrin
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:11 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
 
The bug is not fixed yet:
 
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:06 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
 
The latest java 6 is fine. IT was just updates 23 and 24 I believe.
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexiev, Dobrin
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:52 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
 
Considering that Java 6 will crash in some cases while JIT compiling some CDT code, I prefer not to go to Java 6.
 
 
Alternatively the CDT code can easily be refactored to prevent the ( known) JVM  crash.
 
My two cents.
Dobrin
 
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 7:47 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
 
CDT now requires Java 1.6.
 

-sergey

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've never felt a very strong urge to go to 1.6, but I personally don't mind.
String.isEmpty() and @Override for interface would be nice.
 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:50 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6

Are there any objections against introducing dependency on Java 1.6 in CDT 9? The reasons for introducing the dependency are: String.isEmpty() method, Deque insterface, @Override annotations for implemented interface methods.
 
-sergey


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

 
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top