Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Hudson build is back to stable : cdt-nightly #834

Yes, I have commented on the original bug that test was supposed to fix and have marked this new one a duplicate of that. 

    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=241717

Doug.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Marc-Andre Laperle
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:03 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Hudson build is back to stable : cdt-nightly #834
> 
> We should keep in mind that the failing extract function test is a real
> regression though, see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=352280.
> 
> Marc-Andre
> 
> On 19/09/2011 3:53 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > OMG, all the tests passed!
> >
> > Note though that I have about five of them that can fail at any moment due
> to timing issues with the index. But for now, I'll soak it in.
> >
> > Doug.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hudsonbuild@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:hudsonbuild@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:51 PM
> > To: Schaefer, Doug; vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx; angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx;
> > malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Hudson build is back to stable : cdt-nightly #834
> >
> > See<https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cdt-nightly/834/changes>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top