Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Hudson build is back to stable : cdt-nightly #834

[Marc-Andre Laperle <malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We should keep in mind that the failing extract function test is a real 
regression though, see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=352280.

Marc-Andre

On 19/09/2011 3:53 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> OMG, all the tests passed!
>
> Note though that I have about five of them that can fail at any moment due to timing issues with the index. But for now, I'll soak it in.
>
> Doug.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hudsonbuild@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:hudsonbuild@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:51 PM
> To: Schaefer, Doug; vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx; angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx; malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Hudson build is back to stable : cdt-nightly #834
>
> See<https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cdt-nightly/834/changes>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev